Either/Or Logic works great with Unchanging Atoms
Each Proton & Neutron, the building blocks of Atoms, are Identical.
Atomic Nucleus has Energy Fields with Electrons, which give off Photons
Electrons & Photons as Information Packets to differentiate them from Waves & Particles
Each Electron & Photon are Identical
Permanent Essences of 4 subatomics perfect fit for Set Logic, hence Obedient Equations
Endless Scientific Triumphs validate the notion that obedient equations govern the material universe.
The Interactive Nature of Living Matter includes Self-Reflection, hence Disobedient Equations.
Obedient Equations adhere to either/or logic. Disobedient Equations are self-referential.
Self-referential Disobedient Equations best describe Life’s self-referential nature.
Matter and Obedient Equations are a perfect fit due to 4 unitary subatomics.
The intersection of 2 orthogonal planes determines our Material Universe.
Both material planes behave automatically and are not self-referential.
The Atomic World and the Subatomic World are orthogonal planes.
How can the unitary Subatomic World be disobedient?
Obedient Equations, Either-or Logic, & Matter: A Perfect Fit
2 subatomics well-behaved, 2 ill-behaved
Electrons & Photons don't fit into Traditional Categories.
Disobedient entities at the foundation of Obedient Material Universe
Feynman: Interactions of electrons and photons determine all of chemistry and biology
Consistent behavior of 4 subatomics leads to perfect predictability
Dictionary Definition: Electron's properties depend upon context, unlike Atoms.
Dictionary Definitions: Photon, Light
Light behaves as either a wave or a particle.
Feynman: Light behaves like a particle.
Photons and Atoms: Major divergence in Particle-like behavior
Due to divergences, must expand notion of particle.
Electrons: Individual behavior is unpredictable; General behavior is predictable.
Non-human Life: Individual behavior is unpredictable; General behavior is predictable.
General behavior: Electrons perfectly predictable, Life predictable, Humans not.
Disobedient Subatomics and Life diverge with Obedient Atoms on Individual Predictability
Atoms are pure content, as one of the most permanent Essences in the Universe.
Both Living Algorithm and Electron are context-based.
Environmental Context, not internal Content, determines Human Behavior.
Squaring electron's amplitude determines behavior probability.
Squaring Photon's amplitude arrow determines behavior probability.
Squaring Human's behavior amplitude arrow determines behavior probability.
Probability not required for the certainty of our Atom-based world.
Space & Energy different Inside & Outside of Atom
Space: Continuous on Atom’s Outside; Discontinuous Inside
Energy: Continuous Outside; Quantized Inside
Disobedient subatomic world informs our atom-based world.
Building block logic: Building block laws and substance same as structure
Until the 20th century, Building block logic ruled.
Subatomic world overturns building block logic.
Atoms are the building blocks of the material world.
Electrons and Photons are not the building blocks of the Atom-based World
Intersection of Orthogonal planes (atoms and subatomics) determines Matter's behavior.
Intersection of orthogonal planes (information and matter) determines living behavior.
Subatomics set a Precedent: If 2 orthogonal planes, why not 3?
Two Orthogonal Material Planes instead of One: A disobedient notion
Atomic World is Obedient
The Subatomic World is Disobedient
The Subatomic World & Life share significant features in common: another disobedient notion.
Deconstructing the monolith to make room for the Disobedient Living Algorithm
Our continuous and definitive Atom-based world defines obedience.
The quantized and probabilistic subatomic world is disobedient.
2 Subatomic entities, photons and electrons, don't behave like traditional particles.
How must we expand the notion of particle to include electrons & photons?
Schrödinger’s wave equation reveals probable information about electron.
Plank’s Quantum Constant constrains Wave Information
Information Pulse reveals Spatial Location or Temporal Movement
Substance/Inertia exhibit parallel logical structure to Momentum/Position.
Constructing a new category box for electrons and photons is an uncomfortable proposition.
Electrons & Photons behave ambiguously.
Despite ambiguities, Physicists refer to subatomic entities as ‘particles’ or ‘objects’.
Sight-driven Science comfortable with visual nature of waves and particles
Everyone has seen waves & particles. Who has seen information packets?
We regularly experience information packets via sound: Words & Music
We can see particles in our atom-based world.
Particles in our atom-based world can stop and start.
Sight lends credence to reality
We can't see electrons and photons. We hear their effects.
Sound and sight are different forms of evidence.
Sound is transitory; Sight is permanent
Sound is dynamic. Sight is static.
Sound requires time duration for meaning. Sight captures a moment.
Sound requires context. Sight relies upon permanent content.
Ephemeral, context-based sound doesn't convey permanent essence of sight.
Auditory Information is Mental in nature, not Physical.
Atom-based world obedient to logic of sight. Electrons and Photons are disobedient.
Electrons, Photons, and Sound only exist as transitory information pulses.
Sound and meaning are self-referential, hence disobedient.
Life, Living Algorithm, and Subatomic World share info packets in common.
Info Packets best understood through context-based Logic of Sound.
Partial Reflection, a common experience via transparent medium: glass or water.
If 4% reflection for single pane, then 8% for 2 panes?
Experiments instead show a periodic fluctuation in Percentage Reflection.
Newton: Partial Reflection has nothing to due with surface irregularities.
Wave theory provides satisfactory explanation for centuries
Experimental evidence regarding single photons confutes wave theory.
Internal ‘wheels and gears’ theory of photon ‘particles’ rejected.
If it doesn’t have an edge, ‘how does the photon make up its mind’?
Feynman skips ‘why’ to answer ‘what’ happens.
Nature’s whys are incomprehensible.
Feynman sees a mathematical pattern in the photon data.
Still don’t know how photons ‘decide what to do’.
Squaring the Arrow yields the Probability of the Event.
Arrows are Probability Amplitudes or Events
Arrows are Vectors, where Addition & Multiplication are simple Visual Procedures
Determining the Arrow’s Direction
Nothing to do with Photon’s Physical Attributes
Spinning Arrows determine Direction
Spinning Probability Amplitudes – Information Packets
Spinning Arrow Technique Works
Interaction of Probability Amplitudes generates Interference Patterns.
To make sense of findings: Photons as Info Packets
Info Packets open the door to the Mind/Body connection. Yikes!
Spinning Information doesn’t make sense to Science because it can’t be visualized
Understanding Spinning Info from a Sound-based model
Inclination of Listener’s Reflective Surface determines meaning of verbal information.
Spin Doctors place spin on verbal information to determine meaning
Temporal Distance determines the Meaning of Musical Information
Listener’s Reflective Surface determines if the Musical Information is Digested or Reflected.
Information Packet Model comes with a cost.
Only have Info Packets, no Photons
Feynman: Arrows as Probability Amplitudes, not Photons
Individual Photons secondary to Event Arrow
Feynman: All subatomic objects obey arrow rules.
Feynman defines dimensions of arrow event: Spreading light
Spreading Light notion required to model Light’s features
Atom-based Matter does not spread out over time.
Computing the probability of throwing a 7 with 2 dice
Probability reveals nothing about physical nature of dice.
Light behaves as a wave in normal circumstances, as a particle in extreme circumstances.
To account for extreme circumstances, light spreads over time.
Must take all directions into account, not just straight-ahead
Due to inertia, atom-based particles move in 1 direction only
Info Packet is unrealized potential
Info Packets are virtual, until they interact with the environment.
Info Packets reach out in all directions to maximize possibility of realizing potentials.
Cognitive Science: Meaning from Metaphorical Relationship with our Sensory/Motor Networks
Auditory Information & Neural Networks interact to create emotional meaning.
The meaning of Music & Words only becomes real in the listening.
Measuring Devices ‘interfere’ with subatomic entities.
1% of photons make it through a small hole, no matter if the hole is straight ahead or not.
Both holes open: photons create interference pattern (0% to 4%)
Measuring device at openings: Simple addition (2%). No interference
Feynman: “Strange results have no model.”
Materialist mindset blocks understanding.
As an info packet, the photon gives up information when it is measured.
Information of Sound given up when it comes in contact with surfaces.
Reverse the Arrow from Subatomics to Thought
Summary: Electrons & Photons don’t fit into Traditional Categories
Science’s Sight based Logic does not reveal the nature of Info Packets
Auditory Logic of Music reveals the nature of info packets.
Thoughts include verbal ideas & musical cognition.
Electrons & Photons move forward and backward in time.
Only 3 Laws in the Subatomic World of Electrons & Photons
Counterintuitive Subatomic Interactions permeate our Physical Universe
To experience Music, Listener must reference the past.
Familiarity with a musical composition leads to anticipation of the future.
Self-referencing of Time: a crucial feature of Music Appreciation
Music weaves Past Experiences with the Present
Probabilistic arrows indicate subatomic and musical behavior.
What can the subatomic realm tell us about thoughts?
Thoughts: quanta of mental energy that interact with quanta of physical energy
No objectivity in the subatomic world because the Observer is part of the process.
Objectivity a possibility in our atom-based world
Concentrated Information of atom-based ‘particles’ only give up negligible info to device.
Thoughts, as info packets, are dependent upon context.
Example: Science’s Sight-based context blocks Sound-based understanding.
Science’s presumed Objectivity blocks progress.
Supposedly Objective Sensory Organs provide us with Subjective Information.
Thoughts & Subatomic behavior subject to Observer’s Context
Subatomics & the Random Thought Generator
Techniques to still the mind, not eliminate random thoughts
Mechanistic Rules determine the Dimensions of Subatomic Probability Arrows
Behavior influences the Dimensions of Human Probability Arrows
Probability arrows of human world are ever changing.
Individual Behavioral Arrows: Atoms 1 possibility; Subatomics & Humans Multiple
Collective Behavioral Arrows: Atoms & Subatomics 1 possibility; Humans multiple
We can choose where to focus the mental energy of our Attention.
Sustaining Attention generates a Pulse of Experience or Organization.
Sustaining Attention upon a negative thought chain generates an Experience that increases the probability amplitude.
Choosing to ignore a negative thought chain decreases the probability amplitude.
Sustained Attention generates an Experience which influences the Probability Amplitude
Living Algorithm generates Experience Pulse & Probability Amplitudes
Physics based upon countless approximations.
Discarding terms that ‘won’t make a difference’
Sometimes approximations obscure understanding.
Example: Copernicus’ Circle to Kepler’s Ellipse
Another example: Light behavior from wave to particle
Hawking: Singularity variations beneath the Uncertainty Principle account for subtle differences.
Descartes considers the interaction between only 2 objects.
Simplification eventually leads to modern technology.
Feynman et al: subatomic characterization of simple hydrogen atom.
Empirical evidence validates bizarre theories.
Complexity of computations block application to other atoms
Generalizations introduced to include other phenomena.
Feynman: 3 fundamental actions just a small beginning
Experience applied to rules leads to pragmatic results.
Although based in subatomic world, solid-state physics has its own questions.
Rules provide boundaries: Experience determines pragmatic action.
The inherent imprecision of Physics opens the door to other perspectives.
Disobedient Self-referential Equations & the Disobedient Subatomic World
‘Disobedient’ employed as a descriptor
Chosen in reaction to language of traditional set theory
Self-referential systems are disobedient to traditional logic.
Subatomic world disobedient to traditional constructs of our atom-based world
Equations for Subatomic & Atom-based world obedient to either/or logic
Info Packets of Sound employed to understand the nature of Subatomic entities, not their logic.
What happens when a Photon cracks?
4 Subatomic Particles: the Building Blocks of Atoms
Electrons & Photons don’t behave like Atom-based Particles
Term ‘Particle’ employed to minimize Mystery
Obedient Equations & Similar Rules apply to Atom-based and subatomic worlds.
Vast Differences suggest Intersection of Orthogonal Planes
Space not continuous for the Electron
Feynman summarizes bizarre behavior of Electrons & Photons.
Probability Amplitude Arrows resolve Wave/Particle Paradox
Arrow-based Electrons & Photons are different than concrete waves or particles.
Electrons & Photons behave as Info Packets, not Particles.
Protons & Neutrons behave as Particles, not Info Packets
Proton smashing with high-speed accelerators
Probability Arrows characterize behavior of Subatomic entities that comprise Protons.
A Particle box within a Particle Box both consisting solely of Subatomic Info Packets
Feynman: No experimental doubt that Probability Arrows determine all subatomic behavior
The Subatomic World is a Uniform Plane of Existence
Living Matter constitutes a 3rd orthogonal plane of existence, whose code is revealed by the Living Algorithm.
Inconsistencies at the boundaries of Metaphor
What is the nature of the Metaphorical Relationship?
Metaphors: how we understand experience
Literary Metaphor based upon superficial similarities
Conceptual Metaphor based upon common inferential structure
‘Meta-for’: An understanding from ‘Outside’ the facts
Common Logical structure is ‘outside’ the process.
Purpose to determine where metaphor breaks down
Subatomics & Music: Meaning in Information, not permanent essence
Subatomics & Music: Content secondary to Context
Subatomics & Musical Meaning: Only become Real with the Event
Subatomics have more in common with Musical Info Packets than Atom-based Particles.
Info Packet metaphor does not apply to Electronic Information Processing.
Info Packet metaphor: Meaning transmitted, not Content
Humans, not Machines, are the Receivers in Info Packet Metaphor
Metaphorical breakdown: Scientist required to provide subatomics with meaning.
Breakdown: Subatomics & Sounds Waves go on forever; Transmission Ends
Scientist, a vital part of Info Packet metaphor
Scientific context determines Instantaneous Subatomic Meaning
Musical context developed over Time, not Subatomic Meaning.
Auditory Meaning independent of Physical Sound; Scientific Meaning dependent on Subatomic Results
Scientist linked to Subatomic Meaning, just as Listener linked to Musical Meaning