Glossary: G>M

Glossary G>M: definitions, descriptions and links of the diverse variety of terms
employed throughout the multiple articles devoted to *Information Digestion Model*.

In the early part of the 20th century, a cash prize was offered to anyone who could employ the rules of logic to prove that an underlying proposition was undeniably true. In essence, they wanted to prove that logic can determine truth. This notion was in line with the concept that absolute truth exists. Once an absolute truth was established, a logical structure could be constructed that would be correct in all situations.

Gödel, instead, turned the notion of logical certainty inside out. Employing the traditional tools of logic, Gödel proved that if a system is logically consistent that it can't be complete, and that if a system is complete that it must contain paradox. In other words, a logically consistent system can only apply to part of the puzzle, not the entire picture. For a logical system to encompass the entire puzzle, it must contain some inconsistencies. This is known as Gödel’s Theorem.

This reasoning applies to the material world. Newtonian Mechanics is able to accurately describe the atomic world and larger without any logical inconsistencies. However, to describe the subatomic world, the uncertainty of Probability must be included. More importantly electrons and photons can be viewed as either a wave or particle depending upon the perspective of the observor. These two truths are mutually exclusive logically. This is the paradox that completes the system.

The same reasoning applies to the three mathematical *Realms of Existence*, i.e. *Subatomic*, *Molecular* and *Attention*. Each realm is logically consistent internally and yet is incomplete in that they don’t encompass the whole, i.e. the other realms. Further, the whole contains paradox, i.e. logical inconsistencies, as the three realms contain mutually exclusive truths. For instance, space and time are continuous in the Molecular Realm, quantized in the Subatomic Realm and elastic in the Attention Realm.

This type of reasoning suggests that we live in a paradoxical *Polyverse*, rather than a logical Universe.

According to our *Information Digestion Model, *all living systems engage in an image-overlay process every moment that they are Conscious. The image associated with the current moment is overlaid upon the old composite image to generate a new, i.e. more current composite image. Rather than raw data, living systems interact with
this digested info
- the current composite image. The *Living Algorithm* (LA) is the mathematical realization of this process. The LA generates a mathematical system deemed *Data Stream Dynamics* (DSD). This system provides the mathematical foundation for the *Information Digestion Model.*

Another name for Life’s *Non-Material Realm*. Unique to living systems, this mathematical realm of existence has many features, e.g. Intention, Attention, Feelings, Choice and Imagery. The word ‘Imaginary’ was chosen to emphasize the image-making capacity of living systems – a feature that exclusively material systems don’t have. According to *Attention Theory*, the *Living Algorithm’s* computational process enables living systems to generate an overlay of images that is the basis of both our sense of time and objective reality.

In common parlance, imaginary conveys something that is purely mental – possibly and even frequently without any connection to the material world. In this more technical usage, the images that are the root word of imaginary have a material substrate, but are not the substrate. The physical body is the proxy for the energetic body, not its equivalent.

The imaginary numbers of mathematics provides a useful way of understanding the relationship between imagery and physical reality. In order to solve real life problems, engineers employ imaginary numbers, which are a logical impossibility, in combination with so-called real numbers. Via the algebraic manipulation of these so-called complex numbers, engineers and scientists are able to come up with solutions to real world problems.

In similar fashion, the Imaginary Realm of images interacts with the Material Realm to create real world Living Behavior. For instance via sensory input, we form an image of an apple. While based in material reality, this image is imaginary in the sense that we are imagining a feature of the physical world. Assuming this image is somewhat accurate, we then direct our biological hand to grasp the apple and bring it to our mouth so that we can consume it. While the images are purely ideational, the nutrition is real in that it both keeps us alive as an organism and enables to form more images to organize reality.

This Realm of Images is just one perspective on Life’s non-material component.

For a more in-depth discussion of these topics, read the article: *Attention & Matter: Interacting Realms of Existence?*

The conceptual model that was developed to make sense of the *patterns of correspondence* between the mathematics of *Data Stream Dynamics* and empirical data. Following are some of the model's core assumptions.

1) Living systems contain two types of systems: a) physiological systems, e.g. respiratory, and b) an information digestion system. Both types of system are equally essential for the survival of every life form, including the single cell.

This unique perspective is based upon a simple insight. Just as the Body digests food, the Mind digests information. In both cases, the digestion process transforms environmental substance into a form that Life can employ to fulfill potentials. Just as the body's digestive system extracts food from organic material, the information digestion process extracts meaning from data streams of information. In brief, living systems convert both food into biological energy and information into meaningful knowledge.

2) An Attention synergy is the heart of the information digestion system. The synergy’s components include Attention, Intention, Feelings, and Mind (the Executive function). Feelings, such as appetites, are the driving force. Body becomes hungry for food and Mind becomes curious for information. Just as Body obtains food through the mouth, Mind obtains information through *Attention*/Consciousness.

3) Information comes in the form of *data streams*. Rather than continuous, the data is incremental, as it comes in discrete images/data chunks.

4) Attention utilizes an *image overlay process* to digest the countless data streams that constantly bombard our sensory apparatus. Image can refer to any kind of data, not just visual. Our brain with its complex neuron layering evolved to mimic this digestion process. Recall that digesting information entails transforming meaningless sensory data into meaningful knowledge.

5) The *Living Algorithm* (LA) is the mathematical realization of Attention’s ongoing process. The LA generates a mathematical system, *Data Stream Dynamics* (DSD).

6) Due to this intimate relationship, the rhythms (patterns) of *Attention* align/entrain with DSD’s mathematical forms. The most notable of these are the *Pulse* and the *Triple Pulse*. One obvious manifestation is our limited Attention span. In such a manner, DSD provides the mathematical foundation for our information digestion model.

To better understand the reasoning behind these assumptions, read *Core Postulates*.

Behavioral Dynamics, Information Dynamics, Attention Dynamics: These are all names that I have used to refer to the complex of ideas associated with my *Theory of Attention*. I have employed the same word 'dynamics' in each case because *Data Stream Dynamics* provides the mathematical foundation for my theory. Attention theory addresses the mathematical relationship between human behavior, Information, and Attention, which is the reason for the qualifying words.

See the glossary entries under *Theory of Attention* and *Data Stream Dynamics* for a more up-to-date understanding of Information Dynamics.

Information digestion and information processing are worlds apart. Computers process information; living systems digest data streams to give them meaning. Put another way, processed information has no meaning until Mind digests it.

According to our *Theory of Attention, *the *Living Algorithm * (LA) is the tool that Mind employs to digest data streams. Just as Body digests food, Mind digests data streams. In both cases, the digestion process transforms environmental substance into a form that Life can employ to fulfill potentials. Just as the body's digestive system extracts food from organic material, the LA's digestion process extracts dynamic meaning from data streams, the informational food of living systems. In brief, living systems convert food into biological energy and data streams into meaningful information.

A distinct and unique feature of the digestion process associated with the Theory of Attention is choice. We choose what to eat and when to cease eating. Similarly Mind is also able to choose which information to digest, i.e. where to focus Attention, and when to cease digesting information, i.e. Sleep. In this fashion, this fresh perspective introduces both meaning and choice into the scientific dialogue. The *Information Digestion Model* provides a more complete articulation of this relationship.

Information Physics provides a mathematical foundation for a network of hypotheses regarding Attention' interaction with Information – a *Theory of Attention*. We deem it a 'physics' because it employs a similar architecture of dynamical constructs as does traditional Physics.

Despite this similarity, Information Physics and Material Physics have significant differences regarding focus, elements, mathematics and laws. For instance, Information Physics specializes in the interaction between information and mental energy in subjective space and time, while Material Physics specializes in the interaction between matter and physical energy in objective space and time. Information Physics also provides a mechanism for the transfer of information from the Immaterial Realm to the *Material Realm* of existence. (For more, check out the article: *Introduction to Information Physics*.)

Calculus, a closed system with regular equations, provides the mathematics for Material Physics. The *Living Algorithm*, an open, reflexive equation, provides the mathematics for Information Physics. (For more details, check out the article: *Data Stream Dynamics: Calculus of Dynamic Meaning*.)

The Realm of Intention is an alternative name for Life’s *Non-Material Realm*. Unique to living systems, this mathematical realm of existence has many features, e.g. Intention, Attention, Feelings, Choice and Imagery. The word ‘Intention’ was chosen to emphasize the intentional component of living systems – a feature that exclusively material systems don’t have. According to *Attention Theory*, the *Living Algorithm’s* computational process generates analytics that enable living systems to make better choices with which to fulfill potentials. We deliberately employ our intention to take advantage of these analytics.

As with the Imaginary Realm, the name merely highlights another perspective on the Living Realm. Rather than different realms with different laws, each of these alternative names are referring to the same realm of existence, the so-called Non-Material Realm. The differing names merely suggest a different perspective on Life’s non-material component.

Intentional Realm=Imaginary Realm=Attention Realm=Non-Material Realm

For a more in-depth discussion of these topics, read the article: *Attention & Matter: Interacting Realms of Existence?*

This paradigm holds that the Universe consists of multiple interacting realms of existence – the *Molecular, Subatomic * and *Attention*.
In popular parlance, a realm of existence could have many diverse referents, e.g. the realm of music, sports, or food. In this usage indicated by capitalization, ‘Realm of Existence’ has a more technical meaning. 1) The 3 realms interact. 2) Each realm has a unique mathematical basis. 3) Each type of mathematics employs the same architecture of constructs of traditional Newtonian dynamics, e.g. force. 4) Each realm applies to a unique aspect of existence. These features join the three realms together as a group.

**1) Interaction**: The Molecular Realm interacts with the Subatomic Realm to generate the *Material Realm*. The Material Realm interacts with the Attention Realm to generate the *Living Realm* of existence.

Molecular Realm x Subatomic Realm = Material Realm

Material Realm x Non-Material Realm = Living Realm

**2) Unique Mathematical Systems**: The Molecular Realm is based in traditional Newtonian Mechanics; the Subatomic Realm in Quantum Physics; and the Attention Realm in Data Stream Dynamics.
These ideas are developed in the article – *Matter’s Regular Equations vs. Life’s Disobedient Equations*.

**3) Same Dynamical Architecture of Newtonian Constructs**: While based upon different types of mathematics, each realm utilizes the traditional constructs of Newtonian dynamics, e.g. mass, distance, time and force. These ideas are developed in the Notebook – *Data Stream Dynamics*.

**4) Unique Aspect of Existence:** the Subatomic Realm deals with the potentiality of the micro world inside the atom, the Molecular Realm with the actuality of our material world, and the Attention Realm with the intentionality of our living world.

The Interacting Realms Paradigm expands the prevalent *Material Paradigm*, which holds that there is only one realm of existence, i.e. the Material Realm. The Interacting Realms Paradigm provides an abundance of explanatory power regarding Living Behavior. In contrast, the traditional Material Paradigm provides little, if any, insight into certain key features of Living Behavior. The Interacting Realms Paradigm is a crucial component of my *Theory of Attention*.

For a more in-depth discussion of these topics, read the article: *Attention & Matter: Interacting Realms of Existence?*

The behaviorial phenomenon: Interruptions have negative impact upon a productive session that is disproportionate to their duration.

Scientific studies have demonstrated that interruptions to a productive session have a negative effect upon cognitive performance. This adverse impact is disproportionate to the size of the interruption. We also have cultural evidence of this phenomenon. Theater owners frequently lock the doors at the beginning of a performance to prevent interruptions to the audience's undivided attention. Coaches call time outs to interrupt a player's or team's momentum in the hopes of impairing the performance. This disproportionate negative impact of interruptions on performance is the individual empirical meaning of the Interruption Phenomenon.

*Information Dynamics* provides a mathematical model that behaves in similar fashion. Interrupting the* Living Algorithm’s **Pulse* has a disproportionate negative impact upon the ideal dimensions of the mathematical pulse. This distinct pattern of correspondence between the Living Algorithm's mathematical behavior and the empirical evidence regarding interruptions to a productive session constitutes the general meaning of the Interruption phenomenon.

As such, the Interruption phenomenon symbolizes two levels simultaneously: the individual empirical event and the general linkage between the mathematical and the empirical. For a more detailed analysis of this phenomenon, check out *The Pulse of Attention Interrupted*.

The *Information Digestion Model* was developed to make sense of the correspondences between the mathematics of the *Living Algorithm *and many features of empirical reality, including the sleep necessity phenomenon. To understand why the Math/Data synergy 'forced' us to make certain assumptions, read *Core Postulates*.

Intrinsic Motivation drives humans and other living systems to interact with their environment to solve problems of any kind, e.g. construction or aesthetic. This third drive is independent of the two well known extrinsic drives, i.e. 1) biological needs and 2) environmental reinforcement, i.e. rewards and punishment.

There are a network of behaviors associated with IM. Having been experimentallly cross-validated an uncountable number of times, IM's behavioral network would be considered a *scientific 'fact'*. Although well-established, the network's many components remain *scientific 'mysteries'*, i.e. no general consensus.

The following 4 questions continue to mystify the scientific community.

1) If not physical, what is the root of IM?

2) Why do If-Then rewards inhibit IM?

3) Why does autonomy enhance IM?

4) Why does IM produce so much pleasure/satisfaction?

Although the standard approaches have been helpless, the IM network fits neatly and easily under the umbrella of our *Information Digestion Model. *Our model provides straightforward answers/explanatory power for IM's four mysteries.

1) IM basis? IM belongs to Life's information digestion system (ID system). As such, its root is the craving for information that comes in the form of data streams.

2) Rewards bad? If-Then rewards split Attention between reward and project. With Attention divided between two masters, the individual will be unable to achieve a complete concentration of mental energy. Without this pure concentration, the ability to solve problems is diminished. With diminished problem-solving capacbiolites, the product suffers.

3) Autonomy good? In order to maximize the inspiration (the concentration of Attention) that results in the best product, we must attune to the natural rhthmns of our information digestion system. Each of us is the best judge of these rhythms. Autonomy enables us to better tap into these ID rhythms.

4) IM pleasure? To both feed and optimize the operations of our ID system, Nature attached pleasure to three separate processes: 1) accumulating information, 2) integrating information, and 3) solving problems with this integrated information (knowledge). Each of these processes is a necessary feature of IM. A triple joy is evoked every time we engage in the Intrinsic Motivation process.

*Data Stream Dynamics* provides mathematical support for each of these positions.

For more on these topics, see *Intrinsic Motivation.*

The *Living Algorithm *process reveals the ongoing rates of change/*derivatives* of any data stream. Liminals is the name of the higher derivatives as a group. Below is a visualization of the Liminals of the *Triple Pulse* data stream.

Triple Pulse (green) & the Liminals

The green curve is the data stream's 2nd derivative, the *Directional*. The other curves are visualizations of the data stream's 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th derivatives, the Liminals.

Why the name? Definition of the word 'liminal': *"Relating to or at the threshold, entrance or beginning."* In contrast, subliminal means beneath or under the threshold, while superliminal means above this entrance.

According to *Information Dynamics* theory, the zero line in the graphs divides conscious awareness from the subconscious (the former above the line, the latter below). The positive *Active Pulse*, which is generated by conscious Attention, is above the line (superliminal). The *Rest Pulse*, generated when there is a lack of Attention (sleep), is below the line (subliminal). As the rest of the curves in the Creative Pulse family wander around this threshold between consciousness and the subliminal, we've named them Liminals. According to Info Dynamics theory, they are related to digesting information. If they are not allowed to zero out (fully digest the information), the undigested information can interfere with the potentials of the following cycles.

For a more complete analysis, check out the article *Liminals & Unconscious Cognition*.

According the *Information Digestion Model*, the Living Algorithm (LA) is the mathematical realization of the *image overlay process. * Attention employs the IOP to digest the information contained data streams. The digestion process has two functions: 1) generating useful analytics, e.g. trajectories and correlations between data streams, and 2) transmitting content. The digested information is crucial to the ongoing survival of every living system.

The Living Algorithm's computational process reveals the rates of change (the *derivatives*) of any the data stream. The basic Living Algorithm computes the *Decaying Average* (the data stream's 1st derivative).
The general Living Algorithm generates a mathematical system , i.e. *Data Stream Dynamics* (DSD). DSD provides the mathematical foundation for our *Information Digestion model*.

The *algorithm* for computing the Living Algorithm is a simple procedure.

- 1) Determine the difference between the most recent data point and the existing Data Stream Derivative.
- 2) Scale this difference proportionately.
- 3) Add or subtract the scaled difference from the existing Data Stream Derivative. We add if the data point is larger than the existing Data Stream Derivative; and we subtract if the data point is smaller than the Data Stream Derivative.
- 4) The result of this process is the new Data Stream Derivative.

The mathematics of the Living Algorithm has many features in common with living systems. 1) Past Awareness. Both Life and the Living Algorithm are *self-referential* feedback systems. Living systems have an awareness (whether conscious or not) of the past experience of the organism and the capacity for behavior that reflects that awareness. 2) Context Awareness. They are both sensitive to the present situation – a context sensitivity that incorporates the power to monitor and adjust. 3) *Regenerative*. They both require ongoing data input to sustain the momentum of a pattern, as the potential impact of the data on the ongoing average decays over time. 4) Composite Memory. They both store memory as a synthesis of overlaying images, rather than exact replicas of events. 5) *Fungible*. They both must transform the precise details of data into averages in order to reveal patterns. 6) Recency Effect. While the potential impact of each data point decays over time, the most recent data points in the stream have the greatest potential impact on the Living Algorithm’s ongoing derivatives. Similarly, the most recent events have the greatest potential impact on an organism’s current perceptions. Because both systems share these 6 characteristics, we argue that the Living Algorithm is a powerful model of living systems.

The Living Algorithm produces the derivatives of any data stream. These derivatives act as powerful descriptive predictors. As an indication of the ability, the 3 basic derivatives are called the *Predictive Cloud*.

Finally the Living Algorithm is the ultimate in elegant and computational simplicity. Nothing more than basic arithmetic skills are required. Due to these three features (similarity with living systems, powerful predictors, and simplicity) we argue that the Living Algorithm could be one of Life's primary *algorithms* – a computational recipe for digesting data. In fact, this is a fundamental assumption of *Information Dynamics*. (Check out the article *Living Algorithm* for more details.)

A composite *Realm of Existence* that encompasses Living Behavior, especially with regards *Attention*. According to the * Interacting Realms Paradigm, *the Living Realm consists of the interaction between the

Material Realm x Attention Realm = Living Realm

In contrast, the *Material Paradigm* maintains that the Living Realm is merely a subset of the Material Realm. Unfortunately this paradigm provides little explanatory power for a vast amount of living behavior.

*Attention & Matter: Interacting Realms of Existence?*

The Material Paradigm holds that all phenomena have a material explanation, including living phenomena. This is a prevalent paradigm, especially amongst the college-educated. *Scientism* is a faith-based belief system that derives from this paradigm. Thus far the Material Paradigm has provided little, if any, explanatory power regarding certain key features of Living Behavior.

For instance according to this paradigm, the apparent organizational and intentional feature of the life force should have a material explanation. However, this purely speculative position provides no explanatory power. The inability of the Material Paradigm to deal with these phenomena and many like them suggests the need for a new paradigm. By expanding the discussion to include Life’s non-material component, i.e. the *Attention Complex*, the *Interacting Realms Paradigm* from Lehman's *Theory of Attention* fills this gap.

A composite *Realm of Existence* that encompasses exclusively Material Behavior. According to the *Interacting Realms Paradigm, *the Material Realm consists of the interaction between the

Molecular Realm x Subatomic Realm = Material Realm

Material Realm x Attention Realm = Living Realm

In contrast, the *Material Paradigm* maintains that the Living Realm is merely a subset of the Material Realm. Unfortunately this paradigm provides little explanatory power for a vast amount of living behavior.

*Attention & Matter: Interacting Realms of Existence?*

Encyclopedia Britannica defines the term ‘*matrix’* as: “That which contains and gives shape or form to anything.” For instance, a womb is the matrix for life.

A mathematical matrix is defined as 'a rectangular array of symbols or terms enclosed between parenthesis or vertical double bars to facilitate the study of relationships'. A mathematical matrix is an operation that indicates the interaction (mixture/combination) between two or more components. On the simplest level, a vertical array of numbers interacts with a horizontal array of numbers to produce a mathematical result.

A Math/Data Matrix has both of these features.
This type of matrix
is based upon distinct patterns of correspondence between a mathematical system and a system of empirical data (observable, experiential and/or quantifiable) relating to a particular phenomenon. For instance, there are multiple *patterns of correspondence* between * Data Stream Dynamics (DSD)* and the empirical data associated with

The mathematical matrix provides a deeper understanding of the phenomenon’s underlying structure. For instance, DSD suggests that Attention is an iterative, rather than continuous, process. The mathematical matrix also ‘*contains and gives shape or form’* to the phenomenon. For instance, the *Pulse* is Attention’s most significant mathematical form. As evidence, a wide range of living behavior associated with Attention is subject to the Pulse’s mathematical process, e.g. attention span.

The most famous Math/Data Matrix is between the *Regular Equations* that are obedient to set theory and the precise empirical data regarding Matter. Indeed this matrix has been so successful that many believed, almost unquestionably, that it ultimately applies to all phenomena, including living behavior. In other words, it is the only Math/Data Matrix.

Alternately, a primary intent of these many articles and books is to dissuade you the Reader of this misguided and unproductive belief. Rather than a single matrix, each *Realm of Existence* has its own Math/Data Matrix and they are mutually exclusive. For instance, Newtonian Mechanics will never be able to describe the data from the Realm of Attention.

Molecular Realm: Newtonian Mechanics x Molecular Data

Subatomic Realm: Quantum Mechanics x Subatomic Data

Attention Realm: Data Stream Dynamics x Attention Data

This term encompasses the entirety of the author's study of living behavior. The underlying theme of this line of research is that mathematical mechanisms are a significant factor determining human behavior. Further it is possible to consciously tune into these naturally occuring rhythms to maximize life's potentials. Conversely ignoring these rhythms has a negative impact, minimizing what is possible.

The study of the Mathematics of Behavior consists of, at least, 4 branches or projects: Data Stream Momentum, Root Beings, Energy Bundles, & the Creative Pulse. Information Dynamics only applies to the Data Stream Momentum and Creative Pulse Projects.

**Mathematics of the Moment** is another name for the series of volumes written by the Author regarding the connections between *Information Dynamics* and human behavior. **Triple Pulse Studies**, the 1st volume, lays the foundation for the study by illustrating some striking correspondences between sleep-related behavior and the Living Algorithm's Triple Pulse. **The Living Algorithm System**, the 2nd volume, establishes the plausibility that Life employs the Living Algorithm to digest information. **Data Stream Dynamics**, the 3rd volume, develops the notion that Information Dynamics shares a common dynamical structure with classical mechanics. Further, this dynamical structure provides the causal mechanism behind the aforementioned correspondences. Even more intriguing, the Author develops the notion that the energy density of a data stream determines how mental energy is converted into physical energy. **Attention & the Living Algorithm**, the 4th volume, illustrates the mechanism that ultimately transforms the mental energy of Attention into the information energy of a data stream, which in turn translates into physical energy when the conditions are right. In essence, this volume establishes how Mind influences Body. Check out *Information Dynamics: Volume List* for links to the articles.

Dr. John Medina is a developmental molecular biologist. He holds joint affiliate faculty appointments at Seattle Pacific University, where he is the director of the Brain Center for Applied Learning Research, and at the University of Washington School of Medicine, in its Department of Bioengineering. He has won numerous prestigious awards for his teaching skills. Employing a cross-disciplinary perspective to critique the works of his colleagues is one of Dr. Medina’s specialties. His interdisciplinary approach places him in an ideal position to summarize the research coming from a number of sub-disciplines within the broad field of cognitive science.

In his book, **brain rules**, Dr. Medina summarizes mainstream scientific discoveries in the emerging field of cognitive science. He catalogues the findings from diverse disciplines – ranging from neural science to biology to psychology among others. Dr. Medina also makes useful behavioral suggestions regarding these important scientific discoveries. The evidence for this brain research is well established. Dr. Medina states: "The supporting research for each of my points must first be published in a peer-reviewed journal and then successfully replicated. Many of the studies have been replicated dozens of times." (**brain rules**, p. 5) The prestige of the author makes his book, **brain rules**, an ideal source to transmit the current state of cognitive science to the educated public. Further, it is evident that the findings and theories contained therein are widely accepted by the contemporary scientific community.

The *Living Algorithm's * digestion process computes the rates of change/*derivatives* of any data stream. The data stream consists of a string of discrete data points. We choose to characterize each individual data point as an *instant*. Because of their relative isolation and independence from other data points, we consider *instants* to be one-dimensional.

The Living Algorithm’s process determines the ongoing relationship between these *instants*. By revealing the rates of change/derivatives, the Living Algorithm creates a context that relates the current *instant* (data point) to the immediately preceding *instants* (data points). With each iteration, i.e. repetition of the relating process, the Living Algorithm determines what we define as a *moment*. The data stream derivatives identify the dynamic context of each *moment. *

While there is a *moment *for each *instant *and* moments* are based upon *instants* (data points), they do not include the *instant*. Instead, *moments* indicate the ongoing dynamic relationship between *instants*. Because they indicate the dynamic relationships between *instants* over time, we consider *moments* to be 2-dimensional.

Due to their independence and isolation, *instants* are inherently devoid of meaningful pattern. Due to the context provided by the Living Algorithm, *moments* are inherently filled with mathematical ‘meaning’. In essence, the Living Algorithm transforms ‘meaningless’ *instants* into ‘meaningful’ *moments*.

"A description or systematic exposition of one thing or class of things; a dissertation or treatise written in great detail." (EB Dictionary p. 823)